Minnesota man facing felony charges related to terrorism

A man from the eastern Minnesota city of Braham is facing 21 felony charges related to several incidents that occurred over the past two years. The felonies are related to weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. It is thought that the incidents in question are related to the man’s divorce from his wife.

The incident at the forefront of the case involves the man sending envelopes that contained white powder to the Pine County courthouse. Police report that the man sent the six envelopes on Nov. 19, forcing an evacuation of the premises. The man was arrested in relation to the incident on Dec. 12.

The man had been under investigation for some time, as he was suspected of making other terrorist threats and using weapons of mass destruction that were either simulated or real. The troubles allegedly began in September 2012, when his ex-wife’s attorney received a threat during divorce proceedings. After the man was hit with a protective order, the attorney received a letter containing white powder and a death threat. The attorney withdrew from representing the woman, but that did not prevent the man from allegedly leaving what appeared to be a bomb on the driveway of the attorney’s neighbor. The man then called police to his home three separate times during August 2012 to inspect suspicious liquid containers at the end of his driveway. He told authorities that his ex-wife’s new boyfriend had probably put them there. Over the next few months, police learned that the man had made two phony bomb threats, sent threatening messages to people, claimed to have been kidnapped on two separate occasions and told a friend that he had created chemical bombs. It is thought that the man claimed to be a victim on several occasions in order to repair his reputation with friends and family.

Twenty-one felony counts is a fairly severe charge. While it’s unclear at the moment what kind of sentence the man could face, his defense attorneys may be able to get some of the charges dismissed or reduced. This man does deserve his day in court, and a judge may be more lenient on him depending on the arguments that the defense presents.

Source: kstp.com, “Pine Co. Man Charged with 21 Terrorism-Related Felonies” Megan Stewart, Dec. 16, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.
Minnesota recently passed a public safety bill that brings sweeping changes to the state’s juvenile justice system. While minors sometimes run afoul of the law, the juvenile justice system seeks to account for the differences between children and adults. Therefore, while the penalties for adults convicted of crimes focus on punishment, those for juveniles are aimed at diversion and restorative practices.