Minnesota DWI laws extend beyond charges

The Minnesota Department of public safety says that during the first ten days of the state’s December enforcement campaign targeting driving while impaired, multiple Minnesota law enforcement agencies have arrested drivers on DWI allegations that include blood alcohol levels of 0.30 percent or greater.

The multiple DWI arrests alleging 0.30 percent readings have occurred in areas such as Bloomington, Robbinsdale and Dakota and Goodhue Counties in and near the Twins Cities metropolitan area. Other arrests have been made near the North Shore, in St. Cloud and in Martin and Olmsted counties in Southern Minnesota.

Minnesota law treats high blood alcohol tests more harshly in DWI cases. Normally, a person arrested for a first-time DWI offense in Minnesota faces a fourth-degree DWI, a misdemeanor. However, the law allows prosecutors to pursue a third-degree DWI charge on a first-time offense when an alcohol test returns a result of 0.20 percent or more.

Other consequences can also attach with a higher blood alcohol reading. This summer, this blog discussed the harsher consequences that began in July for offenders who are arrested for DWI with an alcohol test showing a reading of 0.16 percent or greater. Many Minnesota drivers are aware that an implied consent loss of license is associated with DWI arrests.

Typically for first-time offenders, a DWI license revocation runs for 90 days. However in July, the implied consent law created a new one-year revocation period mandatory for first-time DWI offenders who test 0.16 or more. First-time offenders who test at 0.16 or more can choose to install an ignition interlock device on their car, but that comes with installation and monthly service fees, which can add up.

It is important to note that law enforcement agencies statewide are out on the road seeking to arrest drivers on suspicion of drunk driving throughout the year. Through the remainder of December, Minnesota law enforcement agencies will be continuing the beefed-up DWI enforcement campaign.

Anyone facing allegations of DWI should consider speaking to an experienced Minneapolis and St. Paul DWI defense attorney as soon as possible after an arrest to better gain an understanding of the potential consequences and defenses available in an individual case.

Source: Northfield News, “State DWI campaign: More than 800 arrested in Minnesota,” Dec. 19, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.