Southern Minnesota man sentenced for felony DWI on motorized bike

An Austin, Minnesota man was sentenced earlier this month on a felony driving while impaired conviction involving allegations that the man had been driving drunk on a motorized bicycle. Mower County, Minnesota officials claim that the 44-year-old was riding the motorized scooter without any headlights around 2:00 in the morning on July 31. An Austin police officer observed the man run a stop sign and travel on the wrong side of the road before the cop pulled him over, according to the criminal complaint.

Twin Cities area readers may understand that new Minnesota DWI charges may be enhanced based upon a driver’s prior DWI record, or based upon a combination of three or more qualified prior impaired driving incidents within 10 years. A prior felony DWI conviction, or prior criminal vehicular homicide or operation conviction –regardless of the age of the conviction–may also be used to enhance a new DWI charge to a felony level offense.

Law enforcement in Southern Minnesota say that after the Austin man was pulled over on his motorized bike, he measured 0.20 percent alcohol content in a DWI alcohol test. Authorities say that the man had been convicted of felony DWI in 2004 in Houston County, Minnesota. Based upon that prior record, the man was charged with two counts of felony DWI after his July 31 arrest.

The 44-year-old reportedly pled guilty to one count of felony DWI under a plea agreement. A first-degree DWI charge carries a statutory maximum sentence of 7 years in state prison upon conviction, and-or a potential fine of up to $14,000. The man was sentenced to seven year’s probation and fined $500 for the felony DWI conviction. The man will also be required to serve 30 days on electronic home monitoring under the sentencing order.

Source: Austin Daily Herald, “Conviction sticks for DWI on motor scooter,” Matt Peterson, April 15, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.