Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Sex Offender “graduates” from controversial rehabilitation program

“Do the crime, do the time” is a staple of American criminal justice. So, the concept of confining people beyond the length of their sentence is unsettling. In Minnesota, “civil confinement” is mandated where someone is considered a public danger and unable to act within the constraints of the law. It was used to keep people inside psychiatric hospitals in the first half of the 20th century and it is used today to keep sex offenders behind bars.

For a “civil confinement” program to be constitutional, it must focus on treating the sex offender to eventually reintegrate them into society, rather than on punishment. It is a fine line. Far too often the offender can’t be “cured” of his compulsions and remains confined indefinitely.

Turning to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (or “MSOP”), most people never graduate that is until Mr. Oliver D. He was convicted of raping two women in 1995 and spent 14 years behind bars. In 2009 his sentence was up and he was transferred to the MSOP for treatment. The MSOP was established in 1995 as a way to treat sex offenders of their compulsions, to reintegrate them into society.

The program’s requirements are so strict that very few ever graduate. The inmates are constantly monitored and in a very structured environment, making it easy to fail. But Mr. Oliver D. steadily advanced through the program and never relapsed. He is only the fourth person to graduate and he did it in only a few years. To compare there are more than 700 people committed in the MSOP, some of which have been there for over 20 years.

The program is being challenged by numerous inmates as being unconstitutional. The Minnesota government counters that the Constitution does not require a treatment strategy that guarantees eventual release. The inmates were successful in the District Court and the 8th Circuit Court of Appeal will hear arguments later this year.

Mr. Oliver D. will not have an easy time on the outside as he is under intense supervision, has strict reporting requirements and is still on the Sex Offender Registry. If he fails to comply with any of these requirements he could be immediately sent back into the MSOP for additional “treatment.”

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.