Reaching a Plea Bargain in a Criminal Case [infographic]

97% of federal criminal cases and a similar number of state cases are resolved via a plea bargain. In Minnesota, it’s estimated that 90% of criminal cases are resolved via a plea bargain agreement. This means that the vast majority of criminal cases are not decided by a judge or jury.

(Article continues below Infographic)

Pleading Guilty, Nolo Contendere, or Entering an Alford Plea

Prior to plea bargaining a case in Minnesota, prosecutor’s require the defendant to enter either a guilty plea admitting their responsibility for the crime they’re being charged with, or a plea of nolo contendere which means they neither admit or deny their responsibility, but will accept the prosecutor’s recommendation for punishment associated with the crime.

In some cases, defendants may enter an Alford plea which asserts their innocence of guilt, but acknowledges that if the evidence were put before a judge or jury that they would likely be convicted of the crime.

Plea Bargains Can Reduce Punishments

Prosecutors will often drop the most serious charges against a defendant in return for a guilty plea on lesser charges. In the majority of cases, the prosecutor will agree to a specific punishment as part of the deal. These punishments may include a reduced period of incarceration, fines, probation, and restitution. These agreements can reduce the disruption to the defendant’s life and allow them to begin taking positive steps forward.

Judges are Not Bound by Plea Agreements

Judges in Minnesota do not have to accept a plea agreement reached between the prosecution and a defendant’s criminal defense lawyer. However, over the past few years, the courts have demonstrated a strong propensity for accepting plea bargains in many felony cases. However, they are less likely to accept plea agreements in cases that involve the sale or trafficking of dangerous narcotics such as heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine. The same is true for violent crimes involving the use of a deadly weapon and crimes involving the sale or possession of child pornography.

Mandatory Minimums and Plea Bargains

Recent indications from the Department of Justice show that the federal government will push judges throughout Minnesota to enforce mandatory minimum sentences on many low-level felony convictions. Over the past decade, judges in Minnesota have demonstrated an observable unwillingness to do this. This is unlikely to change and individuals who reach a plea agreement with the prosecuting attorney are likely to have their plea agreement accepted by the court.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.