What special efforts are used in Minnesota DWI enforcement?

Prior to the Labor Day holiday we discussed the intense law enforcement presence on Minnesota roads seeking to enforce Minnesota drunk driving laws. Events, celebrations and holidays often bring increased patrols, as police think that more people will be out on the roads who may be impaired because of changes in routine associated with an event.

Minnesota courts have found DWI checkpoints to be unconstitutional in this state, although such roadblocks are authorized under the federal constitution. Our state courts essentially have found (based upon criminal defense arguments) that traffic stops that are made in the complete absence of a particularized suspicion of an offense violate the fundamental principle that the government is barred from unreasonable searches and seizures. A DWI roadblock is essentially a suspicionless stop used to fish for evidence.

In Minnesota, saturation patrols are one method that police use to increase DWI enforcement efforts. The extra officers look for minor violations, such as a broken taillight or a minor moving violation, to justify a traffic stop.

Often during these increased patrol efforts, police will focus on specified alleged violations. This year was no different. Over the Labor Day holiday, law enforcement agencies across the state sought to raise awareness of the important “Ted Foss Move Over Law,” according to the Duluth News Tribune.

Nobody wants our law enforcement officers to be killed while conducting their duties. The move over law requires that driver’s on a multi-lane road move over (or slow down if moving is impossible in traffic) for a stopped emergency vehicle with its lights flashing. The law was enacted after a state trooper was killed conducting a routine stop on I-90.

In states where sobriety checkpoints are authorized (38 states use the roadblocks according to the Governor’s Highway Safety Association), the United States Supreme Court has provided guidelines to maintain constitutional principles to protect free rights. Let’s hope that combining the move over law in Minnesota with DWI enforcement is not becoming a de facto roadblock without safeguards in its use to nab unsuspecting drivers who are surprised by a stopped emergency vehicle along a multi-lane road.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.