Anoka County clerk pleads guilty to white collar crime

A clerk who worked for Anoka County recently plead guilty to one white collar crime charge and two others were dismissed. The woman adjusted the status of various marriage certificates in the county as a way to gain some extra cash. The 52-year-old woman made just over $7,000 over the three years she fraudulently changed marriage license applications. The woman faces up to 45 days in jail.

The 52-year-old woman worked as a clerk in the Anoka County’s vital statistics department. During her time there from January 2008 to October 2010 she fraudulently adjusted the marriage applications of 160 engaged couples. Couples who marry need to file a marriage license application with the county and the county charges a fee for doing so. While it is not clear why the woman engaged in her fraudulent practice it is clear the woman used the application process to gain a little extra money.

According to an assistant county attorney in Anoka County, the woman took advantage of a $60 marriage license discount that couples receive when they complete 12 hours of premarital counseling. For some couples who did not complete the counseling, the woman would create fake paperwork and keep the extra money. Every county in Minnesota is required to offer the $60 marriage license discount if the couple completes the approved counseling. Overall, the woman used four different strategies to gain money from the marriage license application process.

In the majority of cases, the woman recorded a $40 fee payment though the couples paid the full $110. In 38 cases, she forged the fee waiver statements, but each couple paid the full $110. In 13 cases, she created false marriage licenses of couples who never applied. In four cases, she created certificates for couples who applied, charged them the full amount and entered only a portion of the fee paid.

Source: Star Tribune, “Anoka County clerk diverted marriage fees to own pocket,” David Chanen, Aug. 29, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.