Anoka County clerk pleads guilty to white collar crime

A clerk who worked for Anoka County recently plead guilty to one white collar crime charge and two others were dismissed. The woman adjusted the status of various marriage certificates in the county as a way to gain some extra cash. The 52-year-old woman made just over $7,000 over the three years she fraudulently changed marriage license applications. The woman faces up to 45 days in jail.

The 52-year-old woman worked as a clerk in the Anoka County’s vital statistics department. During her time there from January 2008 to October 2010 she fraudulently adjusted the marriage applications of 160 engaged couples. Couples who marry need to file a marriage license application with the county and the county charges a fee for doing so. While it is not clear why the woman engaged in her fraudulent practice it is clear the woman used the application process to gain a little extra money.

According to an assistant county attorney in Anoka County, the woman took advantage of a $60 marriage license discount that couples receive when they complete 12 hours of premarital counseling. For some couples who did not complete the counseling, the woman would create fake paperwork and keep the extra money. Every county in Minnesota is required to offer the $60 marriage license discount if the couple completes the approved counseling. Overall, the woman used four different strategies to gain money from the marriage license application process.

In the majority of cases, the woman recorded a $40 fee payment though the couples paid the full $110. In 38 cases, she forged the fee waiver statements, but each couple paid the full $110. In 13 cases, she created false marriage licenses of couples who never applied. In four cases, she created certificates for couples who applied, charged them the full amount and entered only a portion of the fee paid.

Source: Star Tribune, “Anoka County clerk diverted marriage fees to own pocket,” David Chanen, Aug. 29, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.