Campus Sexual Assaults: Will a New Rule Give Students Ground to Have Cases Dismissed?

A new rule addressing sexual violence and harassment on college campuses may give accused students legal grounds to get their cases dismissed and limit a victim’s ability to seek help from school officials or campus police.

Table of Contents

Sexual Misconduct on College Campuses

Under a new proposed rule, schools may be required to address incidents of sexual misconduct only if the incidents occur on campus or within school programs and activities. Even if a student is enrolled in the school, incidents of sexual misconduct may be ignored by school officials when they happen off-campus. Incidents that occur on campus may be dismissed and unreported, leaving students with limited recourse for help.

The revision of President Obama’s rules by Education Secretary Betsy DeVos changes the intended scope of federal laws barring sex discrimination in education. Current federal guidelines urge colleges and universities to take action against any sexual misconduct that disrupts a student’s education, whether it takes place on-campus or off-campus. The proposed rule under DeVos will require schools to address incidents of sexual misconduct only when they occur within school programs or activities, excluding incidents that occur off-campus.

Due to confusing language, some school officials claim the new proposal allows schools to handle sexual misconduct cases off-campus at their own discretion, while others claim schools are barred from handling off-campus cases. Colleges have raised concerns that the new proposal will cut off the school’s authority at campus boundaries. The President of the University of Wyoming, Laurie Nichols, says that limiting a school’s powers off-campus will push sexual violence to off-campus areas where offenders are beyond a school’s reach for punishment. Nichols also emphasizes that refusal to take action off-campus will suggest indifference on the part of the institution and minimize the impact of sexual assault or misconduct on the student.

According to recent studies, acts of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and date rape are rising on college campuses around the country. At the University of Minnesota, one in four female undergraduate students say they have been sexually assaulted. In 2017, sexual assault cases at U of M rose significantly, but less than half were investigated by school officials. Most colleges admit that it’s difficult to track off-campus sexual assaults because many are never reported to Minnesota police or sexual assault attorneys, but estimates are as high as 60%. Campus resources make it easier for students victimized by sexual assault to seek help, whether they live in student dorms or off-campus housing.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.