December brings more DWI patrols to Minnesota roads

Just before Thanksgiving, this blog reported that law enforcement in Minnesota planned to ramp up enforcement of Minnesota’s tough laws against driving while impaired. Not surprisingly, increased enforcement of Minnesota DWI laws is planned throughout the holiday season. Local police and state troopers across the state are participating in the “Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over” campaign throughout Minnesota during the entire month of December.

One tally indicates that local and state agencies will add 8,500 extra hours of DWI patrols during December on Minnesota’s roads. Each year, roughly 30,000 drivers are pulled into the legal system on DWI allegations. Complicating matters even further are the civil proceedings that can arise after a DUI or DWI arrest in Minnesota.

Cars can be seized for forfeiture in some cases. Driver’s licenses are put in jeopardy after a DWI arrest and any challenge to the license revocation is a separate matter from the criminal DWI charge. The timeline to challenge a DWI license revocation is short. As this blog has reported, a charge of driving after cancellation only makes matters worse.

It is important to note that Minnesota DWI laws have been made stricter. Most Minnesotans know that the legal limit for blood alcohol is 0.08 percent. However, Minnesota law now requires that a driver install an ignition interlock device after a DWI conviction for an offense involving evidence of an alcohol concentration of 0.16 percent or more, even on a first-time DWI offense.

People charged with a DWI in Minnesota have a right to challenge the state’s case in court. Drivers charged with DWI also can challenge the associated license revocation or vehicle forfeiture, but those civil matters operate outside of the criminal case. It is important to speak with a seasoned Minneapolis and St. Paul DUI/DWI defense lawyer as soon as possible after a DWI arrest for an assessment of a case and to learn what implications, both in the criminal case and associated civil cases, may be involved.

Source: Hometown Source, “Added DWI enforcement rolls out in December,” Dec. 1, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.