When False Accusations Involve Hate Crimes

College campuses across the country are experiencing an alarming trend of falsely reported hate crimes, resulting in arrests and fines for accusers and monetary settlements for victims who are falsely accused.

Table of Contents

Hate Crime Hoaxes

Investigations are putting a nationwide trend of hate crime hoaxes on college campuses in the news. From New York to California, police reports show that people are being falsely accused of serious hate crimes they did not commit. False hate crime reports are targeting people of all ages, genders, and nationalities with accusations that range from racial slurs, verbal and physical attacks, sexual assaults, and rape.

In the last few years, there have been a rising number of hate crime hoaxes around the country:

  • Near Kansas State University, a man reported that his car was vandalized with racist graffiti. After an FBI investigation was launched to find the perpetrator, the Kansas man admitted he was responsible for writing the racial slurs on his own vehicle.
  • At the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School in Colorado Springs, five black cadets reported finding racial slurs on whiteboards outside their rooms. A school investigation uncovered that the cadet who reported the hateful racist slurs was responsible for writing them.
  • At St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota, a note that threatened a black female student and used the N-word led to a campus protest that shut down classes for an entire day. An investigation later showed that the threatened female student wrote the note herself to draw attention to campus issues.
  • At the University of Michigan, a female student lied about an attack that resulted in $660 in fines and a 93-day suspended jail sentence. According to the Ann Arbor Police Department report, the student pleaded guilty to the hate crime hoax and admitted to having mental health issues.

According to experts, hate crimes are often falsely reported to attract attention to a political statement or divert the attention of misconduct by an individual who has perpetrated a crime. Some perpetrators seek publicity for self-recognition or sympathy. College campuses create the perfect environment for all of these motives, because of ongoing issues with discrimination, homophobia, and sexual misconduct on campus. In 2015, there were 5,850 hate crimes reported to the FBI. However, a report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics states that over half of the 250,000 hate crimes that took place in the U.S. were not reported to law enforcement for various reasons.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.