Are future changes coming to Minnesota’s criminal system?

In light of several high-profile cases regarding the way law enforcement deals with civilians, the national media has given substantial attention lately to the how the criminal justice system works. The coverage has not only caught the attention of any criminal defense attorney MN, but has sparked activists and legislators to start considering reforms across the board, including in Minnesota programs and at the federal level.

Restoring the vote

In 2009, Minnesota passed a Ban the Box law, which prevents public employers from asking applicants about their criminal history during the initial hiring phase. At the beginning of 2014, private employers were also prohibited from requesting such information at the start of the process.

Going a step further, advocates are pushing for people who are on parole or probation to regain the right to vote. Under current Minnesota statute, a person with a felony criminal conviction is not eligible to vote. Groups such as Restore the Vote Minnesota state that the existing law creates a misrepresentation of the population, as there is a disproportion between the number of Caucasians and minorities who are convicted of felonies. According to a report from Minnesota Daily, last year more than 25 percent of felony offenders in the state were black and unable to vote due to their criminal record.

Sex offender system

Another potential change coming to Minnesota involves the current corrections policy for habitual sex offenders. According to Minnesota Daily, a state representative is planning to propose a bill that would put in place a minimum 60-year prison sentence for people who have repeatedly been charged with a crime involving sex offenses.

As any criminal defense attorney in MN knows, the existing treatment program has often been called out for its shortcomings. Even a federal judge in 2014 stated that the Minnesota Sex Offender Program may violate the U.S. Constitution, according to a report from the Star Tribune.

The Star Tribune reports that the MSOP currently holds 700 offenders. Critics state that the program places the convicted people in prison-like treatment centers that often hold them longer than their prison sentences. The proposed legislation would instead place people in the care of the Minnesota Department of Corrections, taking into account the severity of the crime and the mental health status of the defendant.

A sociology professor at the University of Minnesota told the Minnesota Daily that people have recently been more open to criminal justice reform. Anyone with questions regarding these potential changes should consult with a criminal defense attorney in MN.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.