Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Garrison resident sentenced to over 3 years for drug crimes

A Crow Wing district court sentenced a central Minnesota man to 44 months in prison for possessing over three grams of a controlled substance. He received a second sentence of 39 months for selling narcotics, but the sentences will be served concurrently in the St. Cloud correctional facility, meaning that he will only serve a total of 44 months for both drug charges. During the sentencing, the 26-year-old man received credit for previous time spent in prison.

In addition to the third-degree possession charge, the 44-month sentence was a result of nine other counts, including selling a marijuana mixture. All of the nine counts were dismissed, however.

The man was caught while officers were on patrol at the public access point for Bass Lake. Police decided to investigate a suspicious-looking vehicle containing three male passengers. When officers learned that there was a warrant out for the man’s arrest, they conducted a search and discovered a pill bottle containing gabapentin. The bottle’s label was torn off. Officers also found a large stash of cash and a paper appearing to contain drug notes.

Police discovered even more in the man’s vehicle. Several small bags of marijuana were found, totaling about 5.1 grams. Officers eventually found several empty baggies, two scales and pills such as alprazolam and Seroquel. Even more marijuana was found in a hidden compartment inside of a bottle of RockStar energy drink.

This is not the man’s first drug conviction. In 2011, he was charged with the sale of narcotics when he sold meth to an undercover informant in Brainerd.

The man has definitely benefited from a good defense. The decision to have both of his sentences served concurrently has nearly cut his jail time in half. It’s not unreasonable for a judge to sentence a repeat offender as harshly as possible. Also, having nine out of the 10 possible charges dropped is a big advantage for the man. Defense attorneys can help anyone in these situations negotiate for a lighter possible sentence.

Source: brainerddispatch.com, “Garrison man to serve prison time for drug charges” Jennifer Stockinger, Nov. 27, 2013

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.