How effective are Minnesota’s drug courts?

A Minnesota man was arrested on drug charges and ordered to participate in drug court. According to SouthernMinn.com, the was required, among other things, to meet with his probation officer, make and keep an appointment with a workforce center and apply to five jobs.

As a drug lawyer in Minneapolis may have seen, a recent study shows that the state’s drug court system has been effective at reducing recidivism and lowering incarceration rates. Additionally, the process saves valuable taxpayer money.

About drug courts

The drug court program is intended to help people with alcohol and substance abuse problems make progress toward sobriety. According to the Minnesota Judicial Branch, there are several standards related to participating in drug court, such as the following:

  • Participants must practice abstinence, which is monitored by random, frequent drug testing.
  • Drug courts provide access to rehabilitation and treatment centers.
  • Judges, prosecution and defense work together to help the defendant deal with addiction.

One of the requirements mandates that a participant checks in with a probation officer or makes court appearances. Through fulfilling these requirements, someone charged with a drug crime is able to avoid a jail sentence.

An effective approach

In 2012, the Minnesota Judicial Branch released a report that compared two groups of offenders: those who participated in drug courts and those who went through the traditional court process.

The study found that 41 percent of those in the traditional court group had been charged with a new offense within 2½ years, compared to just 26 percent of drug court participants. A similar trend was evident in conviction rates. A drug lawyer in Minneapolis would note that researchers found that people who participated in drug court were more likely to find employment or be enrolled in school upon completion.

The Star Tribune reported that a recent follow-up study has shown even lower recidivism rates among drug court participants than the 2012 report. Additionally, the same group spent 74 fewer days incarcerated compared to similar offenders.

Saving money

In addition to effectively rehabilitating participants, drug courts also take a financial burden off the judicial system. The Star Tribune reports that the 50 courts in operation across Minnesota have led to an average savings of $4,288 per participant. The National Association of Drug Court Professionals states that drug courts save money because of reduced criminal justice costs, lower victimization and health care services and less prison costs.

The effects of a drug crime conviction can be devastating not only for the accused but also his or her family. Drug courts provide a meaningful alternative that can help offenders avoid prison time and get on a better path for a productive future. Anyone with questions about this matter should contact a drug lawyer in Minneapolis.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.