What does impaired driving involve in Minnesota?

In August, a captain of a Wisconsin sheriff’s office was pulled over in Minnesota on suspicion of driving under the influence. According to WISN.com, the woman initially refused a breath test but finally submitted to one, registering a 0.14 percent blood alcohol concentration. She could face as much as 90 days in jail, as a first-time DWI is a misdemeanor under Minnesota law.

All drivers across the state should have an understanding of how the state treats both the investigative process as well as a conviction. Knowing all the information can keep residents out of unnecessary trouble.

The substances

Alcohol is not the only substance that can warrant a driving while intoxicated charge. According to the state’s law, someone may face criminal charges if driving under the influence of controlled substances or any substance that the person knows could impair driving.

In order for drivers 21 and older to break the law while having alcohol in their systems, they must have a blood alcohol concentration at or above 0.08 percent. Drivers under the age of 21 may be charged if any alcohol is detected. When it comes to marijuana, the law states that any amount detected through proper testing will merit a DWI charge.

Taking the tests

All 50 states have an implied consent law, but Minnesota is just one of 11 that criminalizes refusing a blood, breath or urine test. Drivers who choose not to take the test may be subject to a fine and will lose their licenses for one year.

For those who take a test and fail, there may be severe penalties, such as the following:

  • A first offense merits up to 90 days in jail and fines of as much as $1,000, in addition to license suspension for up to 90 days.
  • A second and third offense may mean up to a year in prison and $3,000 in fines as well as license suspension.
  • A fourth offense can constitute as much as seven years in prison, a four-year license suspension and $14,000 in fines and penalties.

In every situation in which people are convicted of DWI, an ignition interlocking device will be placed on their vehicle in order to prevent drivers from turning on the car without first having to prove that they are not under the influence.

Minnesota law enforcement arrested nearly 25,000 people for impaired driving in 2012, the state’s Public Safety Department reports. Drivers who understand their rights may be equipped to avoid such circumstances.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.