No jail time for Minnesota basketball star

A University of Minnesota basketball star was relieved last week to learn that he will not be put in jail for violating his parole when he was charged with drinking and driving in July. The decision was made by a Miami-Dade judge, who concluded that the basketball player still has “the ability to turn around.”

The Gopher forward was on probation stemming from a felony battery charge in Florida in 2009. Following the charge, the basketball player was placed into a pre-trial intervention program because he was a first-time offender. Had he stayed law-abiding during his probation, the case would have been sealed.

However, the athlete was arrested for violating a restraining order held by a St. Paul woman before his probation was up and became illegible for the program in Florida. The case started from scratch and the basketball player pleaded no contest to the battery charge. He was put on probation, which was set to end in February 2013.

That’s when the third strike occurred. The star forward was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in Minnesota on July 1, which sent him back to Florida Court, where he could have been sentenced to time in jail.

The athlete and his lawyer asked the judge to consider four extra years of probation, but the judge decided that a sentence of two years of probation along with 20 hours of community service per month during that time was enough, noting that the basketball player is “still amenable to treatment.”

However, the judge did give the basketball player a stern warning. He said this could be the athlete’s last chance to get his act together. It appears that the basketball star plans to take the warning to heart. He said he plans to prove right everyone who stood by him through this process, including the Golden Gophers.

Source: Star Tribune, “VERDICT: No jail time for Mbakwe; 2 added years of probation, other stipulations,” Amelia Rayno, Oct. 19, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.