Man Seeks Criminal Defense for Accessing Wife’s Email Account

A Michigan man seeks criminal defense as he faces up to five years in prison for accessing his soon to be ex-wife’s email account. The man is being prosecuted under a Michigan state anti-hacking law normally enforced to punish individuals who have hacked into a government or private business computer system. The man accessed his wife’s email account to confirm whether or not his wife was having an affair.

The 33-year-old man accessed his wife’s email and learned that she was having an affair with her second husband who had been arrested for physically abusing the woman in front of the woman’s young son. The 33-year-old is the woman’s third husband. When the 33-year-old learned of his wife’s infidelity with her second husband he worried that her son would be exposed to domestic violence again. Because of the threat, he gave the emails to the child’s father, his wife’s first husband. The father of the child then filed an emergency child custody motion. The 33-year-old was arrested in February 2009 after his wife learned that he had given emails to his wife’s first husband. The woman then filed for divorce which was concluded this month.

The prosecutor handling the criminal case characterized the man as a hacker and said that the man used his computer technician skills to gain access to a password protected email account. The 33-year-old’s criminal defense attorney said that the statute that the man is being prosecuted under is meant to protect government information and private business trade secrets and protect against identity fraud. The 33-year-old said that they shared the same family computer and that his wife’s passwords were kept in a small book next to the computer.

Responding to what he had done after being released on bond, the man said he did what he had to do to keep a child out of danger.

Source: Detroit Free Press, “Is Reading Wife’s Email a Crime? Rochester Hills Man Faces Trial,” L.L. Brasier, 12/26/10

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.