Minnesota man facing felony charges related to terrorism

A man from the eastern Minnesota city of Braham is facing 21 felony charges related to several incidents that occurred over the past two years.

The felonies are related to weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. It is thought that the incidents in question are related to the man’s divorce from his wife.

The incident at the forefront of the case involves the man sending envelopes that contained white powder to the Pine County courthouse. Police report that the man sent the six envelopes on Nov. 19, forcing an evacuation of the premises. The man was arrested in relation to the incident on Dec. 12.

The man had been under investigation for some time, as he was suspected of making other terrorist threats and using weapons of mass destruction that were either simulated or real. The troubles allegedly began in September 2012, when his ex-wife’s attorney received a threat during divorce proceedings. After the man was hit with a protective order, the attorney received a letter containing white powder and a death threat. The attorney withdrew from representing the woman, but that did not prevent the man from allegedly leaving what appeared to be a bomb on the driveway of the attorney’s neighbor. The man then called police to his home three separate times during August 2012 to inspect suspicious liquid containers at the end of his driveway. He told authorities that his ex-wife’s new boyfriend had probably put them there. Over the next few months, police learned that the man had made two phony bomb threats, sent threatening messages to people, claimed to have been kidnapped on two separate occasions and told a friend that he had created chemical bombs. It is thought that the man claimed to be a victim on several occasions in order to repair his reputation with friends and family.

Twenty-one felony counts is a fairly severe charge. While it’s unclear at the moment what kind of sentence the man could face, his defense attorneys may be able to get some of the charges dismissed or reduced. This man does deserve his day in court, and a judge may be more lenient on him depending on the arguments that the defense presents.

Source: kstp.com, “Pine Co. Man Charged with 21 Terrorism-Related Felonies” Megan Stewart, Dec. 16, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.