Minnesota officers will not be charged for offering marijuana

A number of police officers in Minnesota will not face criminal charges after they were accused by activists of giving marijuana to members of the Occupy Minneapolis movement. After a documentary was released of officers allegedly giving drugs to individuals in Peavey Plaza, there were some who were calling for criminal charges to be filed against the officers involved.

A county attorney said, however, that due to a lack of evidence, including inconsistent testimony from protestors and fellow police officers. The attorney made it very clear that it is his job to “evaluate whether there’s sufficient admissible evidence to establish probably cause to bring a charge.” When there isn’t, it is impossible to file criminal charges.

The officers who were accused of distributing marijuana had apparently been part of the Drug Recognition Evaluator training program for police officers. Part of the program trains officers to recognize when people are under the influence of drugs by monitoring users. In most cases, officers monitor people who are already under the influence, but in this case, the activists were alleging that police were encouraging people to smoke in front of them.

Even though there was very little credible evidence that the officers involved were doing anything wrong, the appearance of impropriety forced one officer into an administrative assignment. He was taken off his usual duties merely because it looked like he had done something wrong. This situation, however, is not unique to law enforcement. Many people in Minneapolis who are accused of drug crimes may find themselves losing their jobs even when no charges are brought or no evidence is found.

Source: Star Tribune, “No charges against cops accused of offering drugs,” Eric Roper, Sept. 21, 2012

Discover more about marijuana charges in Minneapolis by visiting our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.