When Kids Share Sexually Explicit Images with Other Kids

Parents are presented with a new concern as minors take part in sexting, the act of sharing sexually explicit texts or images. This act violates federal law and may result in criminal charges for child pornography.

What Is Sexting?

“Sexting” is a term that refers to the sending of sexually explicit electronic or digital messages or visual images through texts, emails, instant messaging, and social media chats. Sexting may involve explicit text, as well as nude or semi-nude images, through digital and/or video formats like Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok.

Not all state laws officially define sexting, but it is generally described as the act of digitally sending or sharing sexually explicit texts and/or images that may include nude or semi-nude images and sexual acts. Sexting that is done by and between consenting adults over the age of 21, involving only adult images, is legal in most states. However, sexting involving minors is prohibited under federal law and considered a crime of child pornography, a serious felony offense.

Minnesota Sexting Laws Involving Minors

Minnesota does not have a specific sexting law that addresses sexting between minors. Under Minnesota laws, any person (adult or minor) who creates, possesses, or shares a visual image depicting “sexual conduct” involving a minor can be prosecuted for child pornography.

  • Creation of Child Pornography – If convicted, a first offense carries a fine up to $20,000 and a prison sentence up to 10 years.
  • Possession of Child Pornography – If convicted, a first offense carries a fine up to $5,000 and a prison sentence up to 5 years.
  • Sharing of Child Pornography – If convicted, a first offense carries a fine up to $10,000 and a prison sentence up to 7 years.

While some state laws only prohibit creating, possessing, or sharing images of another person, Minnesota child pornography laws prohibit creating, possessing, or sharing of a sexual image of any minor, including oneself. In Minnesota, a teenage girl who sexts a nude selfie to her boyfriend can be prosecuted for sharing child pornography, and her boyfriend can be prosecuted for possession.

In Minnesota, minors who engage in sexting can face criminal charges for child pornography, as well as mandatory sex offender registration and harsh felony penalties. A felony arrest for child pornography in Minnesota requires prompt attention by an experienced lawyer that can provide criminal defense.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.