Mother of slain woman harasses police, suspect

When Minnesota police and prosecutors choose to arrest a suspect and file charges, we expect that they have found sufficient evidence to accuse someone of a crime. Especially with high-publicity, violent crimes, it is even more important that prosecutors don’t just throw around charges because of the serious consequences that will follow an allegation of murder.

After a man was arrested and charged with the alleged murder of his ex-girlfriend, questions have been raised about whether the state had enough information to arrest, charge and prosecute him. Some think that the woman’s mother exerted excessive pressure on police to make an arrest. According to the boyfriend’s attorney, the woman met with the lead detective 28 times in one year and at least once with the chief of the police in an effort to push the police department to arrest the boyfriend.

It wasn’t just the police that the mother had targeted, however. One month after the supposed murder, the mother started using her daughter’s email and cellphone to leave disturbing messages for the boyfriend and his family. In one of the messages the mother specifically told the man to “enjoy the sunshine” while he could, possibly referencing her single-minded push to convict him of her daughter’s alleged murder.

The mother has also been sending the boyfriend and his parents packages, cards and pictures. What used to be a close-knit group has now turned into outright animosity. The mother sent the suspect’s mother a Valentine’s Day card last year calling her evil. The mother also has not denied many of these actions. She has admitted to sending the suspect and his family considerable letters, voicemails, emails and packages, but she claims that all of her communication has been civil.

It is understandable that the mother of someone who was allegedly murdered would be upset and may even do some things she wouldn’t have normally done, but there is no excuse for badgering and harassing someone just because she believes he or she is a suspect. It is certainly unacceptable for police to succumb to such pressure and bring someone in that they don’t have the evidence to arrest.

Source: San Antonio Express-News, “Slaying suspect was haunted by victim’s mother,” Craig Kapitan, Feb. 9, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.