NTSB recommends 0.05 percent for state DWI charges, P. 2

Earlier this week, we opened a discussion of a recent recommendation from the national Transportation Safety Board suggesting that states lower the driving while impaired threshold from 0.08 percent to 0.05 percent blood alcohol concentration.

The problem that commentators have found with the most recent NTSB recommendation is that it seems to go too far. While alcohol may affect drivers in different ways, the new recommendation could essentially make it a crime for many drivers to have a single drink after work if the person then drives home.

The American Beverage Institute, which is a national organization that represents 8,000 restaurants across the country, says that the average woman would reach the legal limit to drive after having one drink. The institute says that the focus on toughening drunk driving laws should not be aimed at moderate drinkers.

The group says that the vast majority of fatal drunk driving related crashes involve heavier drinkers who measure over 0.15 percent BAC. Essentially, the proposal would make it a crime for a commuter to have a single drink after work before heading home. It is important to note that that standard applies to persons under the age of 21 who cannot legally drink in Minnesota in the first place.

The recent recommendation from the NTSB does not directly implicate state DWI laws, but the board does have some influence. Similarly, federal lawmakers do not directly have the authority to set the legal limit to drive in each state—but Congress does control the purse strings over federal highway funding.

In 2000, Congress urged states to change the legal limit to drive from 0.10 percent to 0.08 percent by 2003. Any state that failed to comply by the deadline would see federal highway funding withheld to some point. It is certainly not clear at this point whether the new recommendation will change state DWI laws.

Source: Tampa Tribune, “Attorneys warn against lower DUI threshold,” Ray Reyes, May 26, 2013; USA Today, “Make DUI limit 0.05% blood-alcohol level, NTSB says,” Bart Jansen, May 14, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.