Police: Woman Accused of DWI Drugs After Woodbury Accident

Woodbury Police accuse a St. Paul woman of driving while impaired based upon medication after she was allegedly involved in a January car accident. Law enforcement claims that the woman was in and out of coherence after being in the accident. Police had been in the area of her home to investigate a call reporting an alleged domestic dispute.

Law enforcement first made contact with the woman, who is now charged with DWI drug charges and felony drug possession, in relation to the alleged domestic dispute. Police say the woman was emotional and crying during the police contact, and authorities later released her from the scene.

Officers claim that they found the woman in her car roughly two blocks from the home where law enforcement had first released her. Police say the car had been in an accident, and the woman was sitting in the driver’s seat of the car.

Police claim that the woman was still emotional at the car accident scene. Authorities claim that, at times after the accident, the woman seemed incoherent, while at other times, she regained clarity and gave information to the officers. It is not clear from the media when law enforcement began to suspect that the woman was under the influence after the car accident.

Law enforcement apparently called in a so-called drug-recognition expert. The DRE claims that while officers were trying to learn what was on the woman’s mind during the second police contact of the night, the woman responded, “Mary had a little lamb.”

Apparently, law enforcement conducted a search of the woman’s purse. Police claim to have found pills, including four clonazepam, one trazodone, one cyclobenzaprine and 24 tablets of duly prescribed codeine during the search.

Law enforcement reportedly obtained a blood sample from the woman. Police say test results revealed several controlled substances in her blood, ranging from hydrocodone to morphine and other substances. It is not clear from the media what lab analyzed the blood sample.

The woman is now formally charged with felony drug possession, which generally carries a maximum statutory sentence of five years in prison. She has also been charged with fourth-degree DWI on the DWI drug allegations.

Source: Woodbury Patch, “Apparently Drug-Addled Woman Tells Woodbury Police ‘Mary Had a Little Lamb’,” July 25, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.