Poor testing procedures lead to retesting of blood alcohol samples

Minnesota motorists know that blood tests are common for anyone accused of drunk driving or the more serious vehicular homicide. In many situations, a suspect doesn’t have a choice — police will take the suspect’s blood regardless of whether he or she consents.

Minneapolis police and prosecutors have long argued that blood tests are an effective way of determining a suspect’s blood alcohol level and, thus, whether he or she was legally intoxicated while driving.

Unfortunately, a blood test is only as good as the lab technician that is performing the test and reporting the results. If he or she makes a mistake or fails to accurately record the results, the lab technician may have given the prosecutor false evidence to convict someone of vehicular homicide or drunk driving. When these mistakes do happen and are discovered, it could mean the difference between freedom and prison for someone wrongly convicted.

This is regrettably what has happened in a toxicology laboratory in Colorado. The state’s Department of Public Health has announced that after an outside test discovered that one of the employee’s test results was incorrectly reported, all of his tests have become suspect. Now, the Department is looking into more than 1,700 blood alcohol samples that the technician supposedly tested, trying to determine how many were inaccurate.

Although this happened outside of Minneapolis-St. Paul, it easily could have happened here. There is nothing preventing a laboratory employee from intentionally or negligently reporting incorrect blood alcohol levels to police and prosecutors, leading to numerous wrongful convictions.

 

Source: CBS 4 Denver, “Samples From DUI Cases being Re-Tested,” April 20, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.