What Minnesota’s Not a Drop Law Could Mean for Your Case

Minnesota’s “Not a Drop Law” makes driving under the influence of illegal substances a crime for all drivers under the age of 21.

Underage Drunk Drivers Face Serious Penalties

Minnesota has strict policies and harsh penalties for underage drunk drivers. The state’s “Not a Drop Law” or “Zero Tolerance Law” makes it illegal for all drivers under the age of 21 to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of substances. Under these laws, there is mandatory violation enforcement regardless of the driver’s level of impairment or extenuating circumstances.

States with zero-tolerance policies are allowed to impose penalties on all DWI infractions and violations without subjective judgment that considers the actions or behaviors of the driver. An underage driver with a Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) higher than zero can face the same penalties as an adult driver with a BAC of .08 or higher. Without proper defense by a DWI attorney, underage drivers convicted of DWI face steep penalties and possible jail sentences.

Under Minnesota’s Underage Drinking Law, drunk drivers under the age of 21 face additional DWI penalties. The Underage Drinking Law prohibits the following actions:

  • Consumption of alcohol without parental permission or supervision
  • Possession of alcohol with intention of consumption
  • Purchasing or attempting to purchase alcohol
  • Entering a liquor store with the intent to purchase alcohol
  • Entering a bar or nightclub with intent to purchase alcohol
  • Lying or misrepresentation of legal age to purchase alcohol

When teenage drunk drivers aged 16 and 17 violate DWI laws, they fall under the jurisdiction of Minnesota’s adult courts, not juvenile courts. If convicted of drunk driving, they are subject to the full range of adult DWI penalties. In addition, a DWI conviction will result in the loss of the minor’s driver’s license, and he or she will not be permitted to reapply for a license until 18 years of age. Minnesota’s Not a Drop Law prevents flexibility for juvenile DWI offenders who must be tried in adult courts.

Legal defense by a Minneapolis DWI attorney is important for any underage driver arrested for DWI. A charge and conviction can result in steep monetary fines, probation or jail time, confiscation of a vehicle, termination of car insurance, mandatory alcohol education classes, and community service requirements. Since a DWI conviction remains on record, it can impact future employment, housing, credit, and lifestyle for an underage driver.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.