Violent crime and theft down in Minneapolis

Violent crime across the city of Minneapolis has dropped significantly over the last year. The trend over the past year is a continuation of declining violent crime rates that began two decades ago.

In addition, the most popular crime on the University of Minnesota’s campus, theft, is also on the decline. Despite the reduction in crime levels, experts are not entirely sure what is causing the reduction in crime.

Violent crime in Minneapolis has dropped substantially over the past year. Since last year, violent crime has declined nearly 15 percent according to the Minneapolis Police Department. Crimes considered to be violent crime are homicide, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Violent crime across the city of Minneapolis has dropped consistently over the last five years, and the city saw the lowest amount of violent crime in 27 years in 2010. Minneapolis police believe the lower numbers of violent crime are explained by proactive police work and partnerships with neighborhood watches.

Crime on the University of Minnesota campus in the Twin Cities has also declined. Crime has dropped by six percent at the University. The campus’s most popular crime, theft, has dropped as well. Since 1995, theft has dropped consistently on the campus. In 1995 the number of recorded theft occurrences on campus was 1,263 and in 2010 the number of recorded theft occurrences dropped to 568.

The declining rates of crime at the University and in Minneapolis mirror declining national crime rates. Though crime normally rises during tough economic times, current criminal activity remains on the decline. Experts are not entirely sure what explains the continuing decrease of crime; especially during the jobless recovery.

An assistant sociology professor at the University of Minnesota believes the conflux of changing police practices, economics and demographics has contributed to the lower numbers. A Minneapolis police Sergeant believes the improved relationship between police and communities has helped bring about lower crime.

Source: mndaily.com, “Mpls violent crime down 15 percent,” Kaitlin Walker, 7/27/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.