Welfare recipients with past drug charges must take drug tests

People that have been convicted of drug crimes and are also receiving benefits from the state are now required to comply with drug tests according to a law passed by the Minnesota Legislature last year. St. Louis County officials have now begun strictly enforcing the law, which replaces the “self-reporting” system that was in place prior to its passing. The new law requires the state court administrator to provide its list of convicted drug felons to the Department of Human Services. The DHS will then compare the list to its database of people receiving welfare benefits. Anybody that appears on both lists will be tracked by Minnesota counties.

St. Louis County began enforcing the law in October and has since identified 187 people convicted of felony charges who are also receiving state assistance. This means that around 4 percent of benefit recipients are also felons in the county. A Duluth organization known as the Bethel Work Release Program, with assistance from Virginia’s Arrowhead Center, will be conducting the drug testing.

Across all of Minnesota, 1.62 percent of residents that receive state benefits have been convicted of a drug felony in past decade. Failing a drug test could negatively affect the benefits that people get from programs such as the Minnesota Family Investment Program. State law does not strictly require testing for people utilizing the SNAP food benefits program, but the state has indicated that county officials can perform random drug testing on recipients of SNAP benefits if they’ve been convicted of a felony. No statistics are yet available regarding how many people have failed drug tests.

The law is seen as a compromise. On one side of the issue, people are arguing that all recipients of welfare should receive drug testing before getting any benefits. The other side believes that past offenses should not prevent a person from receiving much-needed help and that the law may be infringing on civil liberties. Either way, with the current law increasing in its enforcement, anyone that has drug charges and is receiving state aid should stay clean if they intend to keep getting benefits.

Source: duluthnewstribune.com, “Mandatory drug tests start for felons on Minnesota welfare” John Myers, Nov. 19, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.