Welfare recipients with past drug charges must take drug tests

People that have been convicted of drug crimes and are also receiving benefits from the state are now required to comply with drug tests according to a law passed by the Minnesota Legislature last year. St. Louis County officials have now begun strictly enforcing the law, which replaces the “self-reporting” system that was in place prior to its passing. The new law requires the state court administrator to provide its list of convicted drug felons to the Department of Human Services. The DHS will then compare the list to its database of people receiving welfare benefits. Anybody that appears on both lists will be tracked by Minnesota counties.

St. Louis County began enforcing the law in October and has since identified 187 people convicted of felony charges who are also receiving state assistance. This means that around 4 percent of benefit recipients are also felons in the county. A Duluth organization known as the Bethel Work Release Program, with assistance from Virginia’s Arrowhead Center, will be conducting the drug testing.

Across all of Minnesota, 1.62 percent of residents that receive state benefits have been convicted of a drug felony in past decade. Failing a drug test could negatively affect the benefits that people get from programs such as the Minnesota Family Investment Program. State law does not strictly require testing for people utilizing the SNAP food benefits program, but the state has indicated that county officials can perform random drug testing on recipients of SNAP benefits if they’ve been convicted of a felony. No statistics are yet available regarding how many people have failed drug tests.

The law is seen as a compromise. On one side of the issue, people are arguing that all recipients of welfare should receive drug testing before getting any benefits. The other side believes that past offenses should not prevent a person from receiving much-needed help and that the law may be infringing on civil liberties. Either way, with the current law increasing in its enforcement, anyone that has drug charges and is receiving state aid should stay clean if they intend to keep getting benefits.

Source: duluthnewstribune.com, “Mandatory drug tests start for felons on Minnesota welfare” John Myers, Nov. 19, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With Drug Possession if the Drugs Aren’t Yours in Minnesota?

You can be charged with drug possession if the drugs aren’t yours in Minnesota. This is one of the most misunderstood areas of criminal law. Many people assume that if they did not own or physically hold the drugs, they cannot be charged. In reality, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to pursue charges based on something called constructive possession.

What Happens if You Contact the Alleged Victim After Charges Are Filed in Minnesota?

If you contact the alleged victim after charges are filed in Minnesota, you may be putting your case, your freedom, and your future at risk. Once criminal charges are filed, courts often impose strict no-contact conditions, either through bail conditions, release orders, or protective orders. Violating those conditions can lead to additional criminal charges, even if your intent was harmless.

Accused of Sharing Intimate Images Without Consent in Minnesota? What to Know

Being accused of sharing intimate images without consent in Minnesota can have consequences that go far beyond the criminal justice system. These cases often involve allegations tied to digital communication, private relationships, and intent, which makes them both legally complex and highly sensitive.