Will longer prison sentences help reduce drug crimes?

While many people in Minneapolis may think that longer and more frequent prison sentences will be an important deterrence to anyone convicted of a crime, they would be wrong. According to the PEW Center on the States, longer prison sentences do little curb non-violent offenders from getting in trouble with the law again. That means sending someone who was convicted of marijuana possession to prison for several years isn’t going to help him or her break a drug habit and he or she may just be back before a judge in a few years’ time.

Not only does the PEW study show that nonviolent offenders in Minnesota will not be helped with longer or more frequent incarcerations, but there is evidence that indicates that these harsh sentences are doing little to drop overall crime rates. Though it is clear that crime has dropped in Minnesota and across the country, the increase in prison sentences was only responsible for one-quarter to one-third of that decrease. And that influence was last recorded in the 1990s.

PEW does not believe that increasing the length of prison sentences or the frequency that people are sentenced to prison will do much to reduce recidivism any more.

Overall, the average prison terms have doubled since the 1990s and one state has seen a 51 percent increase between 1990 and 2009. In addition to the increasingly harsh prison terms and their general lack of effectiveness, the amount of money being spent on incarceration is rapidly increasing. The country as a whole spends a total of $51 billion on corrections each year, much of which is spent on prison.

So, maybe Minnesotan judges should think twice before sending someone on a marijuana possession charge to prison rather than to some other alternative sentencing program.

Source: Southern California Public Radio, “A PEW study finds lengthy prison terms cost a lot, with little return,” Rina Palta, June 6, 2012
https://www.scpr.org/blogs/news/2012/06/06/6521/pew-study-finds-lengthy-prison-terms-cost-lot-litt/

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.