Woman charged for allegedly attacking Minneapolis candidate

An 18-year-old woman is facing aggravated robbery and assault charges after allegedly attacking a man who was once a candidate for mayor of Minneapolis. The incident occurred at the Mall of America on Dec. 26, 2013. The Brooklyn Park woman is facing a possible 20-year prison sentence for each of the three felony counts, as well as a fine of $35,000.

According to the 63-year-old former candidate, he was seated inside of a Starbucks when his iPhone was suddenly taken from his table by a young man, who proceeded to run away. The candidate apparently got up to chase the man when he was stopped by two women, aged 18 and 17. The woman facing the assault charges allegedly jumped on the man’s back. The 17-year-old, known to be from Minneapolis, allegedly proceeded to hit the former candidate in his head using a metal baton. The 18-year-old also allegedly gouged the man’s face using her fingernails while shouting death threats.

When police arrived at the scene, the man was bleeding due to injuries sustained on his mouth and head. Witnesses confirmed that a young man had stolen the iPhone and fled. They also stated that the young man and the young women were sitting at the same table before the altercation. Police were able to take both women into custody, and the 18-year-old admitted that they had been casing the Starbucks on several occasions to see if there were any customers with property that could be stolen. Police also recovered the collapsible baton and the iPhone.

The man has insisted that the women will be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible. However, the woman might be able to get the charges lessened if she works closely with a defense attorney. A good defense might help this woman face less jail time, regardless of the relative fame of the victim.

Source: myfoxtwincities.com, “Woman, 18, charged in Mall of America attack on Minneapolis mayoral candidate” Lindsey LaBelle, Dec. 28, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.