Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Woodbury man accused of felony DWI after cop sees car doing doughnuts

A 21-year-old Woodbury, Minnesota man is facing felony drunk driving charges after he was pulled over shortly after 2:00 in the morning on March 16. Woodbury Police claim that an officer watched a car leave from the area near a saloon and cross into a parking lot outside a fitness center in Woodbury. The officer claims that the driver of the car did some “doughnuts” in the fitness center’s parking lot.

Law enforcement says that the car left the parking area and the driver failed to use a turn signal while turning onto Radio Drive. Police conducted a traffic stop and claim that a 21-year-old Woodbury man was behind the wheel. Police say that the driver has three previous driving while impaired convictions–one entered in 2009 and two recorded in 2011.

Police apparently expanded the traffic stop to investigate for an alleged DWI offense. Ultimately, police assert that the driver blew 0.17 percent in an evidentiary DWI breath test.

Minnesota law provides harsh criminal and civil consequences for drivers accused of repeat DWI offense. The law has various parts, which are referred to as aggravating factors that can be used to enhance a new DWI charge based upon prior qualified alcohol related incidents. A prior DWI license revocation or prior DWI conviction within ten years of a current charge can enhance the new charge to a higher level of offense.

Authorities say that the Woodbury man has three prior convictions of DWI within that ten-year time-frame and have charged the man with felony DWI. A conviction of the charge could bring a maximum sentence of seven years in prison. In addition, administrative penalties may be imposed after a DWI arrest, including a license revocation and, in some cases, vehicle forfeiture.

The administrative issues are handled separately from the criminal case, and a person facing the civil penalties must affirmatively act in order to raise a challenge. The time frame to raise a challenge is a matter of weeks and if not properly raised before time runs out, the challenge is generally lost, even if a conviction is not entered in the criminal case.

Source: Woodbury Patch, “Three-Time DWI Offender Busted After Doing Doughnuts in Woodbury Parking Lot,” Kris Janisch, March 25, 2013

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.