Wright County to Consider Social Host Ordinance

Most young Minnesotans know that the law generally prohibits people under the age of 21 to consume alcohol. But cities and counties across the state have considered, or passed, social host ordinances that apply in the scattered cities or counties across the state. The local laws generally allow authorities to cite people who knowingly allow underage drinking at a party.

Many of the social host ordinances have vague language, but may include language that says a person who allows the party may avoid a citation by doing something to stop or prevent the party, or the unlawful drinking.

The Wright County Attorney reportedly is proposing that the Board of Commissioners in that county pass a social host ordinance. The proposal would make it illegal for someone to have a gathering of three or more people where the host of the party has reason to believe underage drinking may occur.

One of the features of the Wright County proposal is that a “host” does not actually have to be present at the party to be held criminally responsible, according to the county attorney. Many social host ordinances operate with similar language in Minnesota.

The idea generally means that a parent who is not home, but knows of a gathering and allows the party to go forward with reason to know underage individuals may consume alcohol, can be cited for the misdemeanor violation. Last year, this blog discussed a social host ordinance in Woodbury.

Generally, local government bodies seek to enact such laws with the idea to control underage drinking. The ordinances seek to expand the scope of who may be charged when local law enforcement busts a party involving allegations of unlawful underage consumption.

The legal age for drinking in Minnesota is 21 years old. The Wright County Attorney says that in the 18 to 20-year-old age group, authorities cannot charge a so-called host (who is present or not at the party) for a number of state crimes, such as contributing for the delinquency of a minor, or providing alcohol to a minor.

The attorney further wishes to charge so-called hosts, meaning someone who allows the party to occur, with a misdemeanor in those cases where the “host” does not provide alcohol and in those cases where an alleged underage drinker is an adult, but under the age of 21.

It appears the proposal is set for discussion by the board August 28, 2012

Source: St Michael Patch, “Opinion: Attorney Tom Kelly Rolls Out Social Host Ordinance in Wright County,” Tom Kelly, Aug. 17, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.