A Closer Look at False Sex Crime Allegations

False sex crime allegations are made for a variety of reasons including attention, sympathy, revenge, and cover-up of another crime or indiscretion. In some cases, allegations are made by a parent of a young alleged victim.

Who Files False Allegations for Sex Crimes?

Studies show that false allegations for sex crimes like rape and sexual assault are rare, but they do exist. Accusers often make false allegations to gain attention or sympathy from other people or seek revenge against the alleged perpetrator out of anger. In many cases, false accusers are teenage girls who use the allegation as a way to avoid getting in trouble with their parents for something trivial like coming home late for a curfew or disobeying household rules. In cases involving young girls, studies show that it’s often the parents who file false allegations because they believe the story that their daughter has told them.

Mental illness also plays a role in false sexual allegations seen by many sex crime attorneys. Studies show that false reports of rape and sexual assault are often filed by people under psychiatric care or on psychiatric medications for mental illness. Many of these accusers have a previous history of bizarre behaviors, fabricated stories, and charges of criminal fraud. They are often unstable and involved in some type of criminal behavior themselves that are supported by family members and their circle of friends and associates.

The Consequences of False Allegations

Sex crime allegations are not taken lightly by law enforcement. When accusations are made, law enforcement officials take them seriously and devote extensive resources to claim investigations. If they feel like they have a case, the alleged perpetrator will likely face criminal prosecution. Even when allegations are false, an alleged perpetrator is at risk of severe penalties if convicted of the crime.

In many cases of false sex crimes, charges are dropped, but accusers face defamation lawsuits by their alleged perpetrators. Recently, a Minnesota law professor filed a defamation lawsuit, because his tarnished name and reputation led to consequences for his teaching position at a prestigious Minnesota university. When false accusations are made, it’s essential to understand legal rights and the potential consequences of the allegations through a sex crime attorney, even if the allegations are dropped.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.