Thanksgiving travel and increased DWI enforcement in Minnesota

The Thanksgiving holiday always is associated with family gatherings. It is one of the most traveled holidays of the year. People all across Minnesota hit the roads to spend time with family and friends. With the increase in traffic, comes an increase in law enforcement on Minnesota roads. Local law enforcement and state troopers statewide can be expected to be out in full force throughout the holiday weekend.

Sources indicate that between 2008 and 2010, 1,834 drivers were arrested for driving while impaired during the Thanksgiving holiday travel period, which runs from Wednesday through Sunday each year. While state troopers and local police agencies can be expected to be on the road to enforce the tough Minnesota DWI laws throughout the weekend, law enforcement agencies will also be focusing on other types of traffic violations, including enforcing the state seat belt use law.

All drivers and passengers must wear a seat belt when traveling on Minnesota roads. Law enforcement will be on the lookout this holiday weekend for seat belt and child restraint violations statewide. A spokesman for the Minnesota State Patrol says, “Enforcing seat belt laws and arresting impaired drivers are preventive measures we take to ensure safety on Minnesota roads.”

Minnesota receives federal funding from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that is used to help fund DWI enforcement during the Thanksgiving holiday. Law enforcement uses “saturation patrols,” where extra patrol cars join together in a specific area, during holiday periods to look for alleged traffic violations and potential DWI offenses. This year’s enforcement effort is part of the state’s Toward Zero Traffic Deaths safety program on Minnesota roads.

Minneapolis and St. Paul DWI defense attorneys caution drivers to drive safely through the Thanksgiving holiday. Enjoy the Thanksgiving festivities with family and friends.

Source: Brainerd Dispatch, “Guest Column: Thanksgiving can be deadly,” Sgt. Curt S. Mowers, Nov 18, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.