Northfield man accused of felony DWI in Golden Valley

Golden Valley Police reportedly arrested a Northfield man on suspicion of felony drunk driving May 4. Law enforcement says that they received a report from a caller that someone was “slumped over” in a vehicle that was stopped at a Highway 100 exit ramp. Police responded to the area of Highway 100 and Highway 55 and claim to have found the Northfield man asleep in the driver’s seat of a pickup truck. Police claim that the truck was idling and the gearshift was in the “drive” position when they arrived at the scene.

The man is accused of felony driving while impaired, based upon allegations that he was three prior DWI convictions within the past three years in Minnesota. Those allegations are being used to enhance the current Minnesota DWI charges to the felony level.

Authorities reportedly filed a criminal complaint in Hennepin County that charges the man with one count of first-degree DWI and one count of felony DWI, based upon allegations that he refused to submit to an implied consent chemical test during the DWI investigation.

DWI test refusal is a crime under Minnesota law. Officers claim that the accused was taken in for chemical testing and he requested to speak with an attorney. Minnesota DWI and implied consent laws allow a limited right to speak with a DWI defense attorney prior to submitting to a chemical test. Authorities say that the Northfield man requested that his attorney should be present at the time of the chemical test, and that his lawyer could arrive within two hours.

The criminal complaint reportedly alleges that police said they would not wait for the attorney, as that would take too long. Authorities allege that officers requested that the man submit to the implied consent alcohol test again, and the Northfield man refused. Prosecutors are seeking the DWI test refusal charge based upon those allegations. The test refusal charge is being pursued as a felony under the alleged prior DWI convictions.

Fox 9 News reports that the accused has previously had his driver’s license cancelled as “inimical to public safety, and that his driving privileges have not been reinstated. This blog has previously discussed DAC-IPS situations under Minnesota law.

Authorities reportedly booked the accused into the Hennepin County Jail, with bond set at $50,000.

Sources:

  • My Fox Twin Cities, Channel 9 News, “Man found asleep in running truck arrested on 4th DWI,” Shelby Capacio, May 7, 2012
  • Northfield Patch, “Northfield Man Arrested for Fourth DWI in 10 Years, Blows 2.5 Times Legal Limit,” Betsy Sundquist, May 8, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.