Felony DWI charges filed against Minnetonka man arrested in Hopkins

A Minnetonka man was reportedly pulled over in Hopkins recently for allegedly rolling through a stop. The officer says that he blew the air horn on his patrol car several times before the 25-year-old driver pulled over. The officer conducting the stop says that at some point during the traffic stop, the Minnetonka man admitted having “a few” drinks. Ultimately, the officer arrested the Minnetonka man on suspicion of driving while impaired.

Prosecutors have filed formal felony DWI charges against the Minnetonka man. Authorities claim that he has at least two prior DUI convictions from Nebraska within the past ten years. Prosecutors also claim that the Minnetonka man has a prior implied consent type loss of license from an alleged drunk driving incident in Iowa.

Generally, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to seek felony DWI charges based upon a variety of different circumstances, which include prior three or more DWI convictions or other qualified prior impaired driving incidents.

Any felony level DWI offense can bring serious consequences, both direct and administratively. Civil issues involving a driver’s privilege to drive and what is known in Minnesota as a “vehicle forfeiture” can complicate the overall consequences of a felony DWI charge.

In addition to the associated civil issues, obviously a felony DWI conviction can bring its own harsh and direct consequences in the felony criminal case. It is important for anyone accused of DWI to speak with an experienced Minneapolis DWI defense lawyer as soon as possible after an arrest. Moreover, when allegations of out-of-state offenses are being used to enhance a DWI charge in Minnesota, the issues can become even more complex, and it is vital to speak with legal representation to help protect your rights.

Source: Hopkins Patch, “Hopkins Police Bust Man for Fourth Suspected DUI,” James Warden, May 18, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.