Minnesota officials say 1,300 have been arrested for DWI in December

Throughout the month of December, law enforcement agencies across Minnesota have been sending out extra patrols, with officers working overtime, to watch for reasons to pull drivers over, hoping to make arrested for driving while impaired offenses. State officials estimate that roughly 1,300 drivers have been charged with DWI in Minnesota since the first of the month.

Drunk driving charges come with exposure to harsh consequences. A first-time offender can face potential jail time and large fines if convicted of the DWI charge in the criminal case. But Minnesota’s DWI laws also involve issues that are not tied directly into the criminal case. Drivers arrested for DWI in Minnesota will have their license to drive revoked as a result of the arrest.

The loss of license is generally separate from the criminal charge. However, a driver can challenge the implied consent loss of license, if the driver acts promptly in a civil court proceeding. But the time to perfect the challenge is very short, and often passes before a first appearance is scheduled in court for the criminal DWI charge.

Other issues can rack up after a DWI arrest. This blog has previously discussed the issue of ignition interlocks, which are required for drivers who measure 0.16 percent or more, even on a first-time offense, if the driver wishes to drive again before a year passes. For repeat offenders, ignition interlocks mat be required for a much longer period, or drivers can lose the privilege to drive completely in specified circumstances.

Source: Minneapolis Star Tribune, “Extra patrols watching for drunk drivers,” Tim Harlow, Dec. 19, 2012

  • Our firm represents drivers accused of DWI in Minnesota in criminal court, as well as in potential civil proceedings, such as challenges to a DWI-related loss of license or vehicle forfeiture proceedings in Minnesota courts. For more information on the firm, please visit the Minnesota DWI defense page.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.