Teammates of Slain College Football Player Want Charges Dropped – Part 1

Four teammates of the Pace University student and football player who was fatally shot by police on October 17 want an immediate dismissal of their charges. In this post, we will talk about the recent court proceedings related to the investigation. In our next post, we will talk about the conflicting stories of the teammates who say they tried to help their friend and the police who charged the teammates with obstruction of justice and interfering with their friend’s medical aid.

The criminal charges against the four Pace University football players stem from the shooting death of their 20-year-old teammate and fellow student. The 20-year-old student was close to the scene of a disturbance outside of a bar and was shot to death in his car on October 17. According to police, the shooting occurred after the young man drove away and hit two police officers when an officer knocked on the young student’s car window. The shooting death occurred 25 miles north of New York City in Thornwood, New York. The investigation of the fatal shooting is ongoing and is being coordinated by the district attorney.

The young student’s four friends were arrested for allegedly interfering with their friend’s medical aid. The criminal defense attorney for the four college football players argues the charges filed against the players are a police brutality cover-up. Commenting on successfully opposing the prosecution’s request for the postponement of the teammates’ appearance in court, the defense attorney said if the prosecution does not have enough evidence now, then the police did not have enough evidence to charge the college players.

Prosecutors had asked for a two week postponement for the appearance of the four teammates in court. Even though postponement requests usually do not raise any opposition from the defense, the criminal defense attorney of the four students objected to the request explaining the claim of an ongoing investigation is insufficient to deny the four teammates of their right to a prompt arraignment. In our next post, we will discuss the conflicting stories that led to the four teammates’ arrest.

Source: The Washington Post, “Slain Man’s NY Teammates: Drop Charges Against Us,” Jim Fitzgerald, 11/3/10

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With Drug Possession if the Drugs Aren’t Yours in Minnesota?

You can be charged with drug possession if the drugs aren’t yours in Minnesota. This is one of the most misunderstood areas of criminal law. Many people assume that if they did not own or physically hold the drugs, they cannot be charged. In reality, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to pursue charges based on something called constructive possession.

What Happens if You Contact the Alleged Victim After Charges Are Filed in Minnesota?

If you contact the alleged victim after charges are filed in Minnesota, you may be putting your case, your freedom, and your future at risk. Once criminal charges are filed, courts often impose strict no-contact conditions, either through bail conditions, release orders, or protective orders. Violating those conditions can lead to additional criminal charges, even if your intent was harmless.

Accused of Sharing Intimate Images Without Consent in Minnesota? What to Know

Being accused of sharing intimate images without consent in Minnesota can have consequences that go far beyond the criminal justice system. These cases often involve allegations tied to digital communication, private relationships, and intent, which makes them both legally complex and highly sensitive.