Pacemaker Identifies Man in Wanted in Fraud Case

A Florida husband and wife wanted for charges of fraud were apprehended by the Federal Bureau of Investigations after the 62-year-old husband sought treatment at a hospital for a severe bloody nose. The man had a pacemaker and the pacemaker is thought to play a role in hospital workers identifying the man. The Federal Bureau of Investigations has been after the couple for over two years. The married couple owned a title insurance company together and were wanted for stealing around $10 million from clients.

The husband checked himself into a hospital for a bloody nose that would not stop. Hospital officials will not reveal how they were a part of the identification process of the man. Pacemakers contain identifying information as well as important information about a patient’s heart. Doctors are able to obtain the information by scanning the instrument. Individuals with pacemakers are also supposed to carry a pacemaker identification card. Doctors may have identified the man by scanning his pacemaker and seeing his name did not match hospital records. The man could have also been identified if he mistakenly showed his pacemaker identification card to hospital workers.

The couple was indicted on charges of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud in October 2009. The couple allegedly used escrow money transferred to the company for their own personal benefit. According to the indictment, buyer and sellers transferred money to the couple’s title company. The couple would then fraudulently transfer the money before real estate transactions were completed. The couple was known to throw expensive parties, and they were thought of as nice neighbors by those who knew them. If convicted for fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud, the couple faces up to 30 years in prison.

Source: The Durango Herald, “Pacemaker Busts Florida Fugitives,” Shane Benjamin, 12/20/10

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.