Arrests of undergrads at Columbia University test reformed drug laws

Five undergraduate students from Columbia University in New York City were arrested in December as a part of one of the largest drug arrests at an institution of higher learning in the city. Each of the five students were arrested for drug crimes related to the sale of drugs such as LSD, marijuana, cocaine, prescription stimulants and ecstasy. The cases of the five students will be closely scrutinized because the circumstances of the arrests present a chance for the application of New York’s reformed drug laws.

The previous regime of drug laws in New York were referred to as the Rockefeller drug laws, which were passed in 1973 and named after New York’s governor at the time, Nelson Rockefeller. The drug laws were strict and were passed in response to what was called a drug-related “reign of terror.” Critics of the laws argued the laws were unfairly harsh and racist. Critics also argued that the laws imprisoned people who needed treatment. In 2004, the most extreme aspects of the laws were changed and in 2009 aspects of the laws that required mandatory minimum sentences were altered.

The most recent changes of the laws give judges the ability to decide whether nonviolent drug offenders should be sent to treatment programs or other alternatives to jail. The philosophy behind the latest changes of the laws is that an offender’s issue with addiction can be more effectively addressed through treatment than jail time.

The five students participated in 31 drug sales where they sold $11,000 worth of drugs to an undercover officer. Only one of the students currently faces prison time.

Source: The Associated Press, “Ivy League drug dealing arrests test overhaul of New York’s tough Rockefeller drug laws,” Jennifer Peltz, 1/30/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.