Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Adjusted crack sentences to be applied retroactively

In the past, the difference between the drug crimes sentencing of cocaine and crack was a legal and political talking point that demonstrated the unfairness of treating two similar illegal drugs differently based on the users of the drugs. Under the Obama Administration the sentencing laws addressing crack cocaine were rewritten but did not affect those currently in prison for crack cocaine crimes. Recently, the United States Sentencing Commission voted to retroactively reduce the prison terms of prisoners serving time for crack cocaine.

Because of the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s decision last week to retroactively ease crack cocaine sentences, thousands of prisoners could see their time in prison reduced by several years. As many as 12,040 prisoners could be affected. Inmates first sentenced in 1991 and beyond for crack cocaine crimes could apply for the reduced sentences.

Under the old law, an individual possessing five grams of crack faced a minimum prison term of five years. Possession of 50 grams brought a minimum of 10 years. In comparison, possession of 500 grams and 5,000 grams of powder cocaine brought minimum terms of five years and 10 years respectively. The harsher crack cocaine sentencing law was designed as a disincentive in more violent urban areas. It was also believed that crack cocaine was more addictive than powder cocaine.

Research demonstrated crack cocaine was no more addictive than powder cocaine and the difference in sentence terms created allegations of racism. The majority of people serving time for crack are black and the majority of those serving time for cocaine are white or Latino.

Under the new law an individual possessing 28 grams of crack cocaine faces five years and someone possessing 280 grams of crack faces 10. The sentencing terms for powder cocaine remain the same.

Federal judges will decide the approval of reduced sentences on a case-by-case basis. Factors such as whether the prisoner has been rehabilitated or deemed dangerous will be considered. On average sentences will be reduced by about three years.

Source: The Wall Street Journal, “Lower crack sentences to apply retroactively,” Gary Fields, 7/1/11

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.