Intellectual property, theft and Minnesota

Recently, a technical director at Valspar in Minneapolis was caught for attempting to steal $20 million of chemical formulas from the firm. His goal was to trade the formulas for a high-ranking position with a Chinese firm. For the attempted intellectual property theft, the former Valspar worker was sentenced to 15 months in jail. The story of intellectual property theft is a growing one in Minnesota and the United States.

Companies across the United States lose as much as $250 billion from intellectual property theft every year. In Minnesota, firms miss out on hundreds of millions of dollars. The companies in Minnesota most affected by intellectual property theft produce electronic circuits, advanced microprocessors, films, industrial coatings and medical devices according to a local FBI agent. Even though intellectual property theft is on the rise, prosecutions of such crimes do not always follow.

The prosecution of intellectual property crime is unique because companies affected by intellectual property theft are not always eager to admit a crime was perpetrated against them or pursue prosecution. According to law enforcement officials, companies that suffer intellectual property theft can be reluctant to pursue prosecution because they worry about their public perception and how public perception will affect their stock price. Stockholders may suspect something is wrong with a firm on news of intellectual property theft and the company may choose not to pursue their legal options in order to mitigate any worry.

On the flip side, a FBI agent based in Minneapolis says that once companies make the decision to prosecute, the prosecution has a “pretty high success rate.” The largest obstacle law enforcement faces in prosecuting intellectual property crimes is getting the company to cooperate.

Source: Star Tribune, “Fake goods, stolen secrets cost Minnesota businesses billions,” Jim Spencer, Aug. 24, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.