Intellectual property, theft and Minnesota

Recently, a technical director at Valspar in Minneapolis was caught for attempting to steal $20 million of chemical formulas from the firm. His goal was to trade the formulas for a high-ranking position with a Chinese firm. For the attempted intellectual property theft, the former Valspar worker was sentenced to 15 months in jail. The story of intellectual property theft is a growing one in Minnesota and the United States.

Companies across the United States lose as much as $250 billion from intellectual property theft every year. In Minnesota, firms miss out on hundreds of millions of dollars. The companies in Minnesota most affected by intellectual property theft produce electronic circuits, advanced microprocessors, films, industrial coatings and medical devices according to a local FBI agent. Even though intellectual property theft is on the rise, prosecutions of such crimes do not always follow.

The prosecution of intellectual property crime is unique because companies affected by intellectual property theft are not always eager to admit a crime was perpetrated against them or pursue prosecution. According to law enforcement officials, companies that suffer intellectual property theft can be reluctant to pursue prosecution because they worry about their public perception and how public perception will affect their stock price. Stockholders may suspect something is wrong with a firm on news of intellectual property theft and the company may choose not to pursue their legal options in order to mitigate any worry.

On the flip side, a FBI agent based in Minneapolis says that once companies make the decision to prosecute, the prosecution has a “pretty high success rate.” The largest obstacle law enforcement faces in prosecuting intellectual property crimes is getting the company to cooperate.

Source: Star Tribune, “Fake goods, stolen secrets cost Minnesota businesses billions,” Jim Spencer, Aug. 24, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

What Is the Exclusionary Rule in a Criminal Case?

So, what is the exclusionary rule, and how does it apply to your case? The exclusionary rule is a court-driven rule that takes effect when evidence in a criminal case is unlawfully obtained. In your case, a court might use the exclusionary rule if the illegally obtained evidence helped the officers get other pieces of evidence they would not have found otherwise.  The secondary evidence subject to the exclusionary rule is referred to as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The exclusionary rule borrows its reasoning from constitutional rights. So, it applies to criminal cases as a deterrent and remedy rather than a standalone constitutional right.

What Happens If You Violate Probation in Minnesota?

People who suspect that they have violated probation or are already facing a violation charge might ask, “What happens if you violate probation?” A probation violation in Minneapolis, Minnesota could result in a range of consequences, depending on the type and severity of the violation. Those consequences include reprimand from probation officers, enhanced supervision and stricter conditions, and probation revocation and incarceration.