Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Panel plans to change the Minnesota Sex Offender Program

It was after a class action lawsuit filed by inmates of the Minnesota Sex Offender Program argued that their indefinite civil commitment was a violation of their constitutional rights that a federal judge ordered the state to change the program. It was after a foreign court refused to extradite a man accused of a sex crime to Minnesota, however, that it truly became obvious how horrible the Minnesota civil commitment program truly is. Calling it a “flagrant denial” of the suspect’s human rights, the court would not send the man to Minnesota even though there was only a chance that he would be civilly committed.

Unfortunately for Minnesotans, our sex offender program is one of the largest in the nation; Minnesota commits more individuals per capita than any other state. There are currently more than 600 people enrolled in the program. Recognizing the need for a change, a panel of 15 judges, mental health professionals, individuals within the sexual rehabilitation field and public safety officials have been tasked with reforming the program.

By Dec. 3, they will need to have recommendations on how to create an alternative to the secure treatment facilities that are currently being used.

The task is certainly not easy. Though many people may recognize that the Minnesota Sex Offender Program needs to change, some people in the community are likely concerned about releasing former sex offenders into the community, even if they have been classified as nonviolent offenders by prison officials. In addition, as options like halfway houses emerge, the panel will have to deal with individuals concerned that these facilities will be in their neighborhoods.

This blog has previously talked about how serious sex crimes can be in Minnesota, especially for those previous offenders who must register on the sex offender registry. This story shows that, for some, one mistake could also lead to a lifetime of civil confinement.

Source: Star Tribune, “Sex offender panel is clear on gravity of its assignment,” Gail Rosenblum, Oct. 13, 2012

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Person using smartphone with blurred police lights background. charged with a drug crime based on text messages

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.
Handcuffed man in beanie looking distressed during interrogation. police lie to you during an interrogation

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.