New Revenge Porn Law in Minnesota

On August 1, 2016 a new law will go into effect in the state of Minnesota that is designed to crack down on individuals who disseminate private sexual images or attempt to solicit sex for another person without consent. According to Minneapolis felony lawyer Max Keller, “The bill creates long overdue remedies to protect victims of revenge porn while more effectively defining the terms of the crime itself.”

In recent years, revenge porn has developed into a growing crime that has affected the lives of innocent victims throughout the United States. Advances in technology and the expansion of the internet have enabled perpetrators to easily spread sexual photos, videos and even solicitations for sexual encounters all over the world in just a matter of days. Under the new law, anyone who is convicted of revenge porn can face gross misdemeanor charges that could result in up to $3,000 in fines, one year behind bars, or both.

When aggravating factors are present, the crime can be upgraded to a felony, which could result in a convicted individual spending up to five years in prison and facing up to $10,000 in fines. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the crime, the courts may also award compensation to the victim for other damages that are linked to revenge porn. Since these charges can include court costs, reasonable attorney fees, financial losses and up to an additional $10,000 in civil penalties, the costs involved with a conviction can add up quickly.

While the new law is a positive step to protect the rights of revenge porn victims, it is important to remember that many of these cases involve innocent defendants who are in fact victims of angry revenge themselves. According to attorney Max Keller, “It is hoped that the clearer definitions that are provided in the bill will also protect defendants who are wrongfully accused.”

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.