Acquittal for former West St. Paul council member facing misdemeanors

It is not uncommon for people in St. Paul to get into disagreements with one another, especially when the dispute concerns their home environment. Some disagreements may be over property lines, some arise from planned construction projects and some may stem over barking dogs. However, sometimes arguments escalate with people making criminal charges against the other person involved.

Allegations of misconduct

In August 2012, a council member for West St. Paul found himself facing criminal allegations of misconduct. The charges were filed after claims that the council member used his position with the city to interfere with a construction project and a property purchase. A contractor was allegedly verbally abused by the council member but there is no information on what exactly was said. The contractor was at a redevelopment project next to the member’s home when the event allegedly occurred.

The council member was also accused of threatening to use his position to block a buyer’s building permit applications.  The buyer was intending to purchase property next to the member’s home as a rental investment. It is unknown what type of construction was planned for the property or whether the sale of the property was completed.

Innocent till proven guilty

Regardless of whether a person is accused of a misdemeanor crime, like the one above, or something more serious like drug possession or embezzlement, it is important to remember that the person is innocent until evidence proves otherwise. The United States judicial system is founded on this belief and is designed with the intent to protect the innocent.

This means that the burden of proof lies on the shoulders of the prosecution; it is the prosecutor’s responsibility to prove to a judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is guilty of the crime they are accused of. The amount, or type, of evidence required depends on the crime but can involve:

  • Eyewitnesses
  • Forensic evidence like blood, saliva or fingerprints
  • Testimony from law enforcement
  • Defendant’s confession
  • Possession of items relating to the crime
  • Social media postings, pictures and recordings

The Minnesota criminal defense attorney’s job is to question the validity of the evidence presented. If the prosecutor is unable to show that the person committed the crime, then the jury has no other option but to find the defendant not guilty.

Acquitted of all charges

In the case involving the West St. Paul council member, the prosecuting attorney was unable to convince a jury that he committed the crimes he was accused of. As a result, the jury voted for acquittal of all charges.

When people are accused of committing a crime, it may be a good idea for them to seek legal representation. An experienced and knowledgeable attorney can help them understand what to expect in the legal process, advise them of their rights and inform them of the options available to them.

Source: Star Tribune, “Former West St. Paul Council member acquitted of misconduct,” Pat Pheifer, Jan. 15, 2014

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.