Aiding and Abetting: You Can Be Held Liable for Another Person’s Crime

A person who helps another person commit a crime can face criminal charges. Aiding and abetting, sometimes known as accomplice liability, is a legal tool that imposes penalties that are the same as those of the actual crime itself. A key factor in the case of a person charged with aiding and abetting a crime is the level of help he or she provided.

Criminal Liability for Another Person’s Crime

Minnesota Statutes can hold a person criminally responsible for a crime committed by another person if he or she aided or abetted the crime. Intentionally helping, guiding, hiring, scheming, encouraging, or otherwise getting someone else to commit a crime are all components of aiding and abetting liability. If a person assists a friend to plan a bank robbery, for instance, that person can be criminally liable for the bank robbery.

The aiding and abetting law is quite broad. Consequently, almost anything that helps in the commission of a crime could be a ground for aiding and abetting liability. An accomplice can be held criminally responsible for any new offense committed during the planned crime if the new offense was reasonably foreseeable. A person who aids a bank robbery, for instance, would be liable for assault or murder if a bank employee is assaulted or killed during the robbery

A person charged with aiding and abetting in Minneapolis, MN, requires legal representation from a Minneapolis criminal lawyer to lower the odds of further prosecution. The lawyer can offer insight and direction from the start of the legal process to the case determination. The lawyer can also help the accused person prepare adequately for his or her day in court.

Avoiding Criminal Liability for Another Person’s Crime in Minnesota

Under Minnesota law, a person can avoid aiding or abetting liability if he or she quits the crime and makes a justifiable effort to avert the crime. In simple terms, a person who abandons a criminal scheme and takes reasonable steps to stop it can use the abandonment of the crime as a defense against his or her criminal liability.

There is no specific criterion for determining what qualifies as a justifiable effort to stop the commission of a crime. For this reason, reporting the crime to the police and notifying the targeted victim may both qualify as a justifiable effort to avert the commission of a crime.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.