Alternative community program lowers juvenile detention numbers

The number of young offenders who face prosecution and need criminal defense in Hennepin County is on the decline because of the county’s alternative community program. The Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative is responsible for decreasing the number of juvenile offenders in the Hennepin County Juvenile Detention Center (Juvenile Detention Center) by half in comparison to 2006. Officials that work at the Juvenile Detention Center are proud of the new statistic but say there are still goals to work towards regarding the disproportionate number of juvenile detainees who are minorities.

Despite the success in reducing the number of juvenile detainees, 90 percent of the juveniles at the Juvenile Detention Center are minorities. Minorities compose only 30 percent of the population of minors in Hennepin County. The co-chair of the Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative attributes the success of the program to the logical choice of separating low level juvenile offenders from juveniles who have committed serious offenses. Low-level juvenile offenses include curfew violations, missed court dates and truancy. Another factor in the successful reduction in the number of juvenile offenders has been an overall reduction in juvenile crime.

The juvenile caseload for Minneapolis police decreased by 22 percent over the last two years and the number of felonies committed by juvenile offenders has decreased by 45 percent over the last five years. Ramsey County reports similar trends in its juvenile crime rate and juvenile detainee population. Also, Hennepin County has seen budgetary savings of $1.5 million from the new program.

Those working in the juvenile system in Hennepin County plan to reduce racial disparities in the system. Officials will review the procedural process from arrest to detainment, and officials will also start to ask parents to attend mandatory court dates with their children.

Source: Star Tribune, “Far fewer juveniles in lockup, but still a minority gap,” Abby Simons, 1/26/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.