Amy Senser fights for unbiased, impartial vehicular homicide trial

It is a constitutional right that anyone accused of a crime will be tried by an impartial and unbiased jury. This Sixth Amendment guarantee is a basis of the American criminal system and no Minnesota suspect should ever have it infringed upon. As Amy Senser’s attorney attempts to protect her right to an impartial jury, he faces pushback from the Hennepin County prosecutor who is resisting his request to transfer the case to a new and less biased location in Minnesota.

After local media started covering Amy Senser’s charges for vehicular homicide, there have been several concerns about just how impartial a jury from Hennepin County could be. According to Sesner’s attorney, the prosecutors have spoken to members of the local media and described how Senser’s car was covered in the blood of the man whom police say she hit. With such inflammatory language, the attorney believes he must try and move the trial to a new venue.

The attorney has also mentioned some of the online comments that have sprung up surrounding the case. In one particularly graphic and disturbing comment, a reader wrote “Rope. Tree. No admission fee.” With few people leaving their names and addresses, it is very possible that the people who have made such macabre comments could be trying to get on Senser’s jury.

The Hennepin County and Assistant County attorneys, however, have been fighting to keep the woman’s trial in Minneapolis. They have argued that because the accident happened in Minneapolis, the trial should stay in Minneapolis.

Senser’s attorney had asked a judge to move the trial to Kandiyohi County.

For more information, please read this previous post on Amy Senser and being charged with vehicular homicide.

Source: Star Tribune, “Prosecution presses to keep Senser trial in Hennepin County,” Matt McKinney, March 20, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.