Amy Senser fights for unbiased, impartial vehicular homicide trial

It is a constitutional right that anyone accused of a crime will be tried by an impartial and unbiased jury. This Sixth Amendment guarantee is a basis of the American criminal system and no Minnesota suspect should ever have it infringed upon. As Amy Senser’s attorney attempts to protect her right to an impartial jury, he faces pushback from the Hennepin County prosecutor who is resisting his request to transfer the case to a new and less biased location in Minnesota.

After local media started covering Amy Senser’s charges for vehicular homicide, there have been several concerns about just how impartial a jury from Hennepin County could be. According to Sesner’s attorney, the prosecutors have spoken to members of the local media and described how Senser’s car was covered in the blood of the man whom police say she hit. With such inflammatory language, the attorney believes he must try and move the trial to a new venue.

The attorney has also mentioned some of the online comments that have sprung up surrounding the case. In one particularly graphic and disturbing comment, a reader wrote “Rope. Tree. No admission fee.” With few people leaving their names and addresses, it is very possible that the people who have made such macabre comments could be trying to get on Senser’s jury.

The Hennepin County and Assistant County attorneys, however, have been fighting to keep the woman’s trial in Minneapolis. They have argued that because the accident happened in Minneapolis, the trial should stay in Minneapolis.

Senser’s attorney had asked a judge to move the trial to Kandiyohi County.

For more information, please read this previous post on Amy Senser and being charged with vehicular homicide.

Source: Star Tribune, “Prosecution presses to keep Senser trial in Hennepin County,” Matt McKinney, March 20, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.