Beltrami County deputy arrests 2 on marijuana charges

Two Bemidji residents are in custody after a Beltrami County sheriff’s deputy came to their home to serve one of the residents with civil filings. When the 29-year-old man opened the door to accept services, the deputy claims the smell of marijuana was quite strong. After applying for a search warrant, police officers searched the home and claim to have found 85 marijuana plants.

What is interesting about this investigation, however, is that both the 29 year old who originally opened the door and a 42-year-old woman were both arrested on marijuana charges. The Bemidji Pioneer does not indicate who owns or rents the home, nor does it appear that there was any evidence to indicate which of the two individuals arrested was in charge of the supposed grow operation. Although it would be next to impossible to miss 85 marijuana plants in a home, it does not mean that both of the suspects were involved in the manufacture of marijuana.

If police and prosecutors hope to convict either of these individuals they will need to have concrete evidence that shows that they were involved in the growth and care of these marijuana plants. If there is any doubt as to who was involved or if they were both involved, it is important that a criminal defense lawyer brings that up during their trials. It is not enough to say that they were both in the home and, thus, were both involved with the manufacture of drugs.

The two suspects are being held on $10,000 bond.

While it does not seem that the way in which the Beltrami deputy approached the home violated any constitutional rights, it is essential that the evidence presented against the two specifically connect them to the marijuana plants. Trying to convict them on conjecture or assumptions as to who was monitoring the plants will not be good enough.

Source: The Bemidji Pioneer, “Minnesota: Overwhelming smell of marijuana leads police to Bemidji growing operation,” Justin Glawe, Feb. 21, 2013

Stop by our Minneapolis drug possession website to find out more about how we have helped individuals charged with marijuana possession defend themselves.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.