Briefs filed in Amy Senser’s vehicular homicide appeal

When we last talked about Amy Senser, she had just been convicted of hitting someone with her car and leaving the scene of the accident.

She was sentenced to 3 1/2 years for her two convictions of criminal vehicular homicide, but in December, her attorney filed an appeal with the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Now, the assistant Hennepin County attorney has filed his brief supporting the Senser’s conviction and Senser’s attorney has 15 days to file his.

In the initial appeal, Senser’s attorney argued that there was evidence that the wife of a former Minnesota Viking had not received a fair trial. Citing many suspected errors, Senser is trying to prove that her convictions should be thrown out. Anyone who is charged with a crime in Minneapolis is guaranteed that he or she will receive a fair trial. This not only means that the jury must be unbiased, but that the judge also remains impartial. Though the judge does not determine guilt, he or she can influence the trial, preclude or admit certain pieces of evidence, or in some other way affect the outcome. If what Senser’s attorney says is true, Senser may have been convicted because she did not receive a fair trial.

The assistant Hennepin County attorney has argued, however, that the judge did not make any mistakes in the trial. Accusing Senser of trying to negatively influence the jury herself, the county attorney supported the trial court’s decision to exclude evidence that the man who was hit had a considerable amount of cocaine in his system at the time of his death. Though many people may consider this to be not only relevant information, but information that could have affected the outcome of the trial, the county attorney says that the cocaine would not have affected the man’s behavior on the night of the accident.

It remains to be seen what Senser’s attorney will argue in response to the county attorney’s lengthy brief, but he must quickly submit his brief before oral arguments will be scheduled.

Source: Star Tribune, “Prosecutor: Senser proof ample,” Abby Simons, Feb. 11, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.