Briefs filed in Amy Senser’s vehicular homicide appeal

When we last talked about Amy Senser, she had just been convicted of hitting someone with her car and leaving the scene of the accident.

She was sentenced to 3 1/2 years for her two convictions of criminal vehicular homicide, but in December, her attorney filed an appeal with the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Now, the assistant Hennepin County attorney has filed his brief supporting the Senser’s conviction and Senser’s attorney has 15 days to file his.

In the initial appeal, Senser’s attorney argued that there was evidence that the wife of a former Minnesota Viking had not received a fair trial. Citing many suspected errors, Senser is trying to prove that her convictions should be thrown out. Anyone who is charged with a crime in Minneapolis is guaranteed that he or she will receive a fair trial. This not only means that the jury must be unbiased, but that the judge also remains impartial. Though the judge does not determine guilt, he or she can influence the trial, preclude or admit certain pieces of evidence, or in some other way affect the outcome. If what Senser’s attorney says is true, Senser may have been convicted because she did not receive a fair trial.

The assistant Hennepin County attorney has argued, however, that the judge did not make any mistakes in the trial. Accusing Senser of trying to negatively influence the jury herself, the county attorney supported the trial court’s decision to exclude evidence that the man who was hit had a considerable amount of cocaine in his system at the time of his death. Though many people may consider this to be not only relevant information, but information that could have affected the outcome of the trial, the county attorney says that the cocaine would not have affected the man’s behavior on the night of the accident.

It remains to be seen what Senser’s attorney will argue in response to the county attorney’s lengthy brief, but he must quickly submit his brief before oral arguments will be scheduled.

Source: Star Tribune, “Prosecutor: Senser proof ample,” Abby Simons, Feb. 11, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.