Burnsville man arrested for felony fleeing police, DWI

Minnesota’s implied consent and driving while impaired laws are a complex jigsaw puzzle that allows prosecutors to use a variety of aggravating factors to enhance a Minnesota DWI charge. However, prosecutors often tack on other allegations to bring additional charges after a suspected DWI investigation.

Burnsville police claim a man failed to stop after an officer tried to make a traffic stop to investigate alleged traffic violations. Eventually, the driver came to a dead end and stopped his vehicle, according to Burnsville police. The driver is now accused of two counts of second-degree DWI, based upon two separate legal theories under the DWI jigsaw puzzle.

A second-degree DWI charge is classified as a gross misdemeanor under Minnesota law, which can expose a person accused of the offense to up to a year in jail upon conviction. However, prosecutors are also seeking a felony level charge against the accused Burnsville man, based upon allegations that the driver knowingly fled from police in a motor vehicle.

In addition to the felony charge of fleeing police in a motor vehicle, the Burnsville man is facing the two gross misdemeanor DWI charges. One of the DWI charges alleges that the Burnsville man has two prior DWI convictions on his record within 10 years of the current charges. Each of those priors is being used to enhance the current charge from a misdemeanor to a gross misdemeanor. Because the defendant did not submit a breath, blood or urine sample prosecutors will have to prove impairment in the current DWI offense based upon the arresting officer’s observations and testimony.

However, the Burnsville man also faces a second count of gross misdemeanor DWI based upon the test refusal. That second charge is enhanced to a second degree DWI based upon allegations that the defendant has one or more prior qualified impaired driving incidents within 10 years of the current charge.

The case highlights the complexity of DWI charges in Minnesota. However, implied consent civil proceedings may also be involved after a DWI arrest, complicating the scheme even further. Civil proceedings may include challenges to an implied consent loss of license, and in some cases, challenges to potential vehicle forfeiture after a DWI arrest.

It is important for individuals arrested for DWI in Minnesota to speak with an experienced DWI defense attorney as soon as possible after an arrest to gain an idea of what the picture looks like in an individual case under the complex Minnesota DWI and implied consent jigsaw puzzle.

Source: Burnsville Patch, “Burnsville Man Charged with Fleeing Officers, DWI,” Betsy Sundquist, Dec. 26, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.