Burnsville woman sentenced to over 4 years in felony DWI case

A Burnsville woman who pled guilty to felony DWI test refusal and drug possession charges has been sentenced to just over four years in prison after pleading guilty to two of three charged felonies. One count of felony DWI was dismissed. In March, this blog discussed the case against the woman who was accused of drugged driving after a December 2010 traffic stop.

The woman reportedly had refused to submit a blood sample under Minnesota’s implied consent law on the night of her arrest and was charged with DWI. The woman’s charges were enhanced to the felony DWI charges based upon a Felony criminal vehicular operation conviction from 2005.

In the recent case, police claimed that they could smell marijuana in the car during the traffic stop, and that prescription pills were found during a search of the car. She was charged with felony driving under the influence of a controlled substance, felony DWI test refusal and felony possession of a controlled substance after her arrest.

In March, as this blog reported, the woman sought to take her case to a jury. The Dakota County prosecutor reportedly had said in March that he intended to seek a 10-year prison sentence against the woman. That 10-year sentence reportedly would have been what is known as an upward departure.

Experienced DWI defense lawyers know that Minnesota sentencing laws are complex, and sentences can vary greatly in individual cases based upon a variety of factors and arguments before the sentencing judge.

The lengthy prison sentence that Dakota County prosecutors planned to pursue would have been double the presumptive recommended sentence under Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines, according to a story in the St. Paul Pioneer Press. The woman faced sentencing at a hearing earlier this week and the judge imposed a sentence of four-years-three months in prison for the woman, significantly less than the prosecutor had wanted.

Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press, “Burnsville woman gets prison for second DWI,” Maricella Miranda, May 2, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.